Translate this page into:
Physiological Adaptation of Three Halophytes from the Same Ecological Habitat and Analysis of their Supporting Soil
*Corresponding author: Dr. Tahani Fahad Almutairi Department of Biology, College of Science, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Ta.almutairi7@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Almutairi TF, El-Gamal SM. Physiological Adaptation of Three Halophytes from the Same Ecological Habitat and Analysis of their Supporting Soil. J Qassim Univ Sci. 2026;1:112-26. doi: 10.25259/JQUS_21_2026
Abstract
Objectives
This study was conducted to investigate the physiological adaptations and metabolic responses of three halophytes: Pulicaria undulata, Tamarix nilotica, and Lycium shawii—during their flowering stage under abiotic stress conditions in Sabkhat Al-Awshaziyah. The study aimed to assess the physical and chemical characteristics of the rhizosphere soils associated with these species.
Material and Methods
Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from around each species and analyzed for their physical properties, including soil texture and hydraulic conductivity, as well as chemical properties such as cation exchange capacity (CEC) and organic matter (OM) content. To understand plant responses to salinity stress, several physiological and biochemical parameters were measured, including leaf area, total carbohydrate content, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll and carotene), and antioxidant enzyme activities (peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase).
Results
The rhizosphere soils were predominantly sandy. Soils associated with L. shawii and P. undulata showed a medium-coarse texture, while those of T. nilotica were fine sandy. Hydraulic conductivity values were relatively high, ranging from 23.33 to 27 cm h-1. Overall, soil fertility was low, as reflected by CEC and OM values. The highest CEC was recorded in T. nilotica soil, reaching 12.3 Meq/100 g in the subsurface and 11.27 Meq/100 g at the surface, whereas L. shawii exhibited the lowest values at both depths. Organic matter content followed a similar trend, with T. nilotica showing the highest percentages (0.83% at the surface and 0.74% in the subsurface). In contrast, P. undulata and L. shawii displayed comparable but lower OM values.
Regarding physiological traits, T. nilotica had the smallest leaf area (0.66 cm2/plant) but accumulated the highest carbohydrate content (31.5%). L. shawii recorded the lowest carbohydrate level (16.8%). Pigment analysis revealed that P. undulata contained the highest levels of chlorophyll and carotene. In terms of antioxidant activity, peroxidase activity was highest in L. shawii (477.33 u/g fresh weight/h), while P. undulata showed the greatest polyphenol oxidase activity (38.94 u/g fresh weight/h).
Conclusion
The results demonstrate that the studied halophytes employ different adaptive strategies to cope with saline stress. T. nilotica appears to benefit from relatively better soil conditions and higher carbohydrate accumulation, P. undulata maintains stronger photosynthetic pigment levels, and L. shawii exhibits enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity. Collectively, these findings highlight the ecological significance and practical value of these species as potential candidates for the conservation and rehabilitation of saline areas.
Keywords
Antioxidants Enzymes
Lycium Shawii
Osmolytes
Pulicaria Undulata
Sabkha
Salinity
Tamarix Nilotica
INTRODUCTION
About 70% of the world’s land area is threatened by soil salinity, which disrupts agricultural lands and causes plant production imbalances.[1] Locally, 40% of Saudi agricultural land suffers from salinity due to improper irrigation methods, according to the Saudi Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture (2017).[2] Moreover, Saudi Arabia is characterized by high salinity, shallow waters, and elevated temperatures, as well as severe desert environments without lakes or rivers.[3,4] Therefore, salt stress is a significant environmental factor that limits plant growth, crop production, and distribution.[5] Sabkhas are salt-affected areas widely distributed throughout the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. They are known for their adaptability to severe environmental conditions, due to their elevated saline content and drought-tolerant ecosystems, in which particular halophytic plants have adapted to grow.[6] Generally, the Qassim Region of Saudi Arabia has a high-salinity ecosystem, which affects plant growth and is a major challenge behind the slow agricultural development in the area.[7] The habitat-related effects and environmental factors associated with desert climates, high salinity, and water and nutrient shortages have underscored the importance of halophytic plants in the fields of alternative medicine and drug discovery.[8] Sabkhat Al-Awshaziyah is located in the Qassim region, 15 km east of the city of Unaiza, with a total area of approximately 18 square km. It has a geological impact in Saudi Arabia due to its extreme salinity [Figure 1].[9]

- Pictures of Sabkhat Al-Awshaziyah location in different seasons. (a) Sabkhat Al-Awshaziyah in the summer after water dryness and accumulation of salt residues, (b) same location in the winter where salt precipitations are shown on the edges (N 26° 03’ 53.63”; E 44° 09’ 17.42”).
One potential solution to address the elevated salinity problem is to cultivate halophytic crop species, which are resistant to severe salinity stress.[10] Halophytes are plants that can survive in media containing up to 200 mM or more NaCl, and they are part of various angiosperm families with polyphyletic origins of salt tolerance.[11] Severe environmental conditions cause plants to maintain higher levels of defensive compounds, which are produced as part of their survival mechanisms against bacterial infection, excessive oxidative stress, and animal grazing.[12] For instance, the relatively higher levels of secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids, and phenolics, make these plants more intriguing for biological and chemical evaluations.[13] Additionally, these compounds also contribute to significant health-promoting and nutritional benefits against reactive oxygen species (ROS) by producing phenolic and flavonoid compounds to neutralize their harmful effects as part of their antioxidant defense systems. Locally, halophytes are also used as livestock feed and for treating medical conditions among ailing populations.[14,15]
Moreover, halophytes can grow under toxic conditions in metal-polluted soil due to their antioxidant systems, which also contribute to their salt tolerance and to their survival even in the presence of other non-halophytes in their surrounding area. These factors make a very promising impact of halophytes on both humans and the environment. In addition, they provide us with a new direction in the utilization and development of saline-alkali soils that assures sustainability.[16] Adaptation to saline soils results from modifications in biophysical, physiological, morphological, and biochemical traits of plants.[17] For instance, activating enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and phenol oxidase, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds, modulating carotenoid levels, promoting chlorophyll (Chl) synthesis to sustain the photosynthetic system, regulating ROS production, and producing osmoregulatory and compatible solutes like proline.[18] Therefore, the growth of halophytic plants would offer a sustainable strategy to restore soil salinity and to exploit limited water resources, thereby allowing agriculture to move into previously barren areas of salt marshes.[16]
Pulicaria undulata
Pulicaria undulata (P. undulata), with the local name “Gethgath,” is a high-salt-tolerant plant genus belonging to the Asteraceae family, which includes more than 100 herbaceous plants. These species are ubiquitous in high-salinity soils and dry areas of the Qassim region in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, they are characterized by their adaptation to survive in harsh conditions through biochemical and morphological mechanisms.[19]
P. undulata is a perennial bush native to Saudi Arabia, and its average height is 40-50 cm and extends almost to a meter with several branches emanating from the plant’s base. The flowers appear in the spring (February-April) in the form of 8 mm yellow knots and have an aromatic smell [Figure 2]. Interestingly, P. undulata is highly useful for rehabilitating natural vegetation. It can be used with various plant seed mixtures to restore vegetation in a particular area or strengthen the ecosystem.[20]

- Pictures of P. undulata in different seasons. (a) P. undulata in the flowering phase during the spring season. (b) Demonstration of dryness on most P. undulata flowers during the summer season (N 26° 04’ 9.94”; E 44° 09’ 57.83”).
Tamarix nilotica
Tamarix nilotica (T. nilotica), with the local names “Athel” and “Tarfa,” is a perennial small bush belonging to the Tamaricaceae family and is distributed in the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa [Figure 3]. It is characterized by its slow, irregular growth, reaching heights of up to 8 m, and by having multiple stems. Moreover, the flowering phase occurs in March to May, and the plant has no requirements for soil or irrigation due to its high tolerance to high salinity, as well as its adaptation to drought and wind. In addition, it is used to stabilize banks and slopes and to strengthen the ecosystem through its dense, branched roots. Notably, the plant has salt glands, which contribute to its high salinity tolerance.[20]

- Pictures of T. nilotica in different seasons. (a) T. nilotica branch at the flowering phase in the spring season. (b) T. nilotica in summer showing green-greyish color (N 26° 04’ 3.78”; E 44° 09’ 48.98”).
Lycium shawii
Lycium shawii (L. shawii), with the local name “Awsaj,” is a perennial bush belonging to the Solanaceae family, spread across the Arabian Peninsula, Egypt, Sudan, and Palestine [Figure 4]. Its average height ranges from 1-2 m. Furthermore, the flowering phase occurs from November-June. Notably, the wood of this plant can be used as fuel due to its low smoke output.[21]

- Pictures of L. shawii in different seasons. (a) L. shawii flowers during November-June period. (b) falling L. shawii leaves in the summer (N 26° 04’ 6.17”; E 44° 09’ 57.67”).
L. shawii is adapted to desert conditions and can withstand drought, high temperatures, frost, wind, and grazing. It is highly saline-tolerant and almost does not need irrigation once its seeds germinate. It is used as a predominant plant for hillside planting, slope stabilization, and environmental improvement.[20]
Therefore, the present study aims to assess the physical and chemical analyses of Sabkhat Al-Awshaziyah soil. In addition, three naturally growing halophytes from the area have been selected for physiological and chemical studies: Pulicaria undulata, Tamarix nilotica, and Lycium shawii. These halophytes and their supporting soils might help in understanding the underlying mechanisms of their powerful ability to withstand harsh conditions and contribute to ecosystem sustainability, in addition to their economic and biological value.
MATERIAL & METHODS
The current study was conducted on three naturally occurring halophytes (P. undulata, T. nilotica, and L. shawii) from Sabkhat Al-Awshaziyah in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia (N 26° 03’ 53”, E 44° 09’ 17”). The samples were collected in the period from March-April, 2023. Nine homogeneous, medium-sized plants were selected to represent halophytes at the flowering stage in the selected area and labeled for the collection of plant leaves for physiological analyses. The soil samples were collected from under the same marked plants at two depths (0-15 cm and 15-30 cm), placed in sterile plastic containers, and brought to the laboratory for physical and chemical analyses.
Soil physical analysis
The disturbed samples were used to determine particle size distribution, bulk density (Db), particle density (Dp), and total porosity (P%) according to Burt’s (2014) method.[22] Additionally, hydraulic conductivity (HC) was estimated according to Page (1982).[23]
Particle size distribution
The particle size distribution of the soil samples was estimated using sodium hexametaphosphate as a dispersion agent by the pipette method.
Bulk density (Db)
The bulk density values were determined using undisturbed soil cores according to the following formula:
Where: Db = Bulk density (g cm-3), Ms = Dry mass of soil in core (g), and Vt = Total volume of soil (particles plus pores) in core (cm3).
Particle density (Dp)
A pycnometer determined the Dp values according to the following formula:
Where: Dp = Particle density (g cm-3), Ms = Dry mass of soil in core (g), and Vs = The volume of soil particle (cm3).
Total porosity (P%)
The total porosity was calculated using the following formula:
Where: P = Total porosity, Db = Bulk density (g cm-3), and Dp = Particle density (g cm-3).
HC
The HC was estimated by the constant-head method, in which 2 mm sieved, air-dried soil samples were packed in plastic cylinders, closed at the bottom with a piece of cloth, and held in place with a rubber band. The plastic cylinders were 20 cm in length and 5.08 cm in internal diameter. Then, soil was weighed and added to bring the height in the cylinder to 8 cm (based on soil bulk density and the cylinder volume). The calculation was done according to the Darcy formula as follows:
Where: K = HC (cm h-1), Q = volume of water conducted (cm3), H = height of soil column (L)+ head of water (h) (cm), A = cross section area (cm2), T = time (h)
Soil chemical analysis
The following analyses were carried out according to Burt (2014).[22]
Soil’s pH
The pH was determined electrometrically in a soil paste using a pH meter.
Soil’s electrical conductivity (EC)
The EC was assessed in saturated soil paste extracts using an EC meter.
Soil’s cations (Na+, K+, Ca 2+, Mg 2+)
The soluble Na+ and K+ were estimated photometrically by the flame photometer. Soluble Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ were estimated using the Versenate method and ammonium purpurate as an indicator for calcium an Eriochrome black T for calcium and magnesium.
Soil’s anions (Cl-, CO3-2, HCO3-, SO4-2)
Chloride ions (Cl-) was estimated by titration using 0.05 N Silver nitrate solution according to Mohr’s method. Carbonate (CO3-2) and bicarbonate (HCO3-) were determined by titration with sulfuric acid, using the phenolphthalein and methyl orange indicators. Sulphate ions (SO4-2) were calculated by subtracting the total soluble anions from the total soluble cations.
Soil’s calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) was determined using the Collin’s Calcimeter method.
Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR)
SAR was calculated by dividing the molar concentration of the monovalent cation Na+ by the square root of the molar concentration of the divalent cations Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ using the following formula:[24]
Where: SAR = Sodium Adsorption Ratio, Na⁺ = Water soluble Na⁺ (mmol (+) L−1), Ca 2+ = Water soluble Ca 2+ (mmol (+) L−1), and Mg 2+ = Water soluble Mg 2+ (mmol (+) L−1)
Soil’s cation exchange capacity (CEC)
CEC was assessed using ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) according to Burt (2004) method.[25]
Soil’s organic matter (OM)
OM was studied using the Walkley and Black method, as described by FAO (2019).[26]
Soil’s gypsum content (GC)
GC was determined by acetone precipitation according to Burt’s (2004) method.[25]
Soil’s exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP)
ESP was calculated according to Richards et al. (1954) following the equation below:[27]
Physiological Analysis
Leaves of selected halophytes (L. shawii, P. undulata, and T. niotica) were collected from saline habitats at the flowering phase to perform several physiological tests.
Growth characters
Leaf area cm2 ̸ plant by the ImageJ-based method according to Cock et al. (2023).[28]
Chemical properties
Photosynthetic pigment
Chl content was estimated in fresh leaves as described by Witham et al. (1971).[29]
Antioxidant enzyme activity
a)Peroxidase activity : measured after 2 min in fresh, weighted leaves using the method described by Fehrmann and Dimond (1967). [30]
b)Phenoloxidase activity : measured after 45 min in fresh, weighted leaves that were extracted according to Hammad and Ali (2014). [31]
Proline, total carbohydrates, soluble sugars, and free amino acids (protein)
The total contents of proline, total carbohydrates and soluble sugars, and free amino acid concentrations were estimated according to the methods described by Bates et al. (1973),[32] Dubois et al. (1956),[33] and Rosen (1957),[34] respectively.
Statistical analysis
ANOVA analysis for the studied parameters was performed in SPSS (version 25; International Business Machines Corporation, NY, USA) using the least significant difference (LSD) test at the 95% significance level. Means and Standard deviation (SD) are shown.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Soil physical analysis
Soil texture
The soil texture analysis at the surface (0-15 cm) and the subsurface (15-30 cm) revealed that the soil under L. shawii and P. undulata was overall moderately coarse sandy at both depths. In contrast, the soil under T. nilotica was fine sandy at both depths [Table 1].
| Physical analysis* | Particle diameter (mm) | P. undulata | T. nilotica | L. shawii |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface (0-15 cm) | ||||
| C. Sand | 2-0.5 | 4.87a ± 0.15 | 3.43b ± 0.42 | 4.37a ± 0.15 |
| M. Sand | 0.5-0.1 | 51.1a ± 0.53 | 35.3b ± 0.1 | 50.7a ± 0.2 |
| F. Sand | 0.1-0.05 | 41.4a ± 0.26 | 55.33b ± 0.35 | 42.7c ± 0.1 |
| Silt + Clay | <0.05 | 2.0a ± 0.2 | 5.5b ± 0.2 | 1.9a ± 0.1 |
| Subsurface (15-30 cm) | ||||
| C. Sand | 2-0.5 | 4.2a ± 0.2 | 3.83b ± 0.15 | 3.9a, b ± 0.1 |
| M. Sand | 0.5-0.1 | 54.53a ± 0.47 | 37.37b ± 0.32 | 51.73c ± 1.16 |
| F. Sand | 0.1-0.05 | 38.5a ± 0.2 | 51.63b ± 0.25 | 40.8c ± 0.36 |
| Silt + Clay | <0.05 | 2.93a ± 0.15 | 6.93b ± 0.4 | 2.9a ± 0.1 |
| Text. Class | M. Sand | F. Sand | M. Sand | |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the probability level of 5% according to LSD.
C: Coarse, M: Medium, F: Fine, P: Pulicaria, T: Tamarix, L: Lycium
Bulk density (Db)
Bulk density analysis showed the highest value in L. shawii at the soil’s subsurface (15-30 cm) with a mean of 1.71 g cm- 3, whereas the surface soil (0-15 cm) for the same plant had a mean of 1.54 g cm- 3. On the other hand, T. nilotica soil surface recorded the lowest bulk density of 1.36 g cm-3, and the soil subsurface for the same plant was 1.6 g cm-3 [Table 2].
| Physical properties* | P. undulata | T. nilotica | L. shawii |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface (0-15 cm) | |||
| Bulk density (Db) | 1.44a ± 0.03 | 1.36b ± 0.04 | 1.54c ± 0.04 |
| Particle density (Dp) | 2.44a ± 0.04 | 2.36b ± 0.03 | 2.54c ± 0.05 |
| Total pororsity (P%) | 41.27a, b ± 0.7 | 42.63a ± 1.08 | 39.53b ± 1.1 |
| HC | 25.0a, b ± 1.0 | 26.33a ± 0.58 | 23.33b ± 1.53 |
| Subsurface (15-30 cm) | |||
| Bulk density (Db) | 1.6a ± 0.03 | 1.6a ± 0.04 | 1.71b ± 0.03 |
| Particle density (Dp) | 2.59a ± 0.03 | 2.67b ± 0.02 | 2.72b ± 0.02 |
| Total pororsity (P%) | 38.47a, b ± 1.6 | 40.23a ± 1.67 | 37.17b ± 1.19 |
| HC | 27.0a ± 1.0 | 23.67b ± 1.53 | 24.33b ± 0.58 |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the probability level of 5% according to LSD.
Db: bulk density, Dp: particle density, P%: Porosity percentage, HC: Hydraulic conductivity.
Dp
DP analysis revealed a range of 2.36-2.54 g cm-3 in the surface soil and 2.59 to 2.72 g cm-3 in the subsurface soil. The highest values were observed in L. shawii soil at the soil’s subsurface (15-30 cm), while the lowest values were recorded for T. nilotica soil at the soil’s surface (0-15 cm) [Table 2].
Total porosity (P%)
The highest total porosity was found in T. nilotica soil, whereas L. shawii had the lowest. The P% of T. nilotica soil was 42.63% and 40.23% at the soil’s surface and subsurface, respectively. Whereas L. shawii had a P% of 39.53% at the surface and 37.17% at the subsurface [Table 2].
HC
HC analysis showed high values of 23.33-26.33 cm h-1 at the soil surface and 23.67-27 cm h-1 at the subsurface. The lowest HC at the subsurface level was seen in T. nilotica soil, whereas the highest was found in P. undulata [Table 2].
Soil chemical analysis
pH
The pH of all selected soils was 7.8, indicating slightly alkaline soil at 25°C [Table 3].
| Sample* | pH | EC (ppm) | Soluble cations (mEq L-1) | Soluble anions (mEq L-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca 2+ | Mg 2+ | Na+ | K+ | CO3--+ HCO3- | Cl- | SO4-- | |||
| Surface (0-15 cm) | |||||||||
| P. undulata | 7.82±0.02 | 231.67a±10.41 | 0.6a±0.1 | 0.2a±0.1 | 2.87a±0.15 | 0.14a±0.03 | 0.11a±0.01 | 2.5a±0.2 | 0.8a±0.1 |
| T. nilotica | 7.86±0.03 | 983.33b±9.07 | 3.23b±0.15 | 1.7b±0.1 | 10.23b±0.21 | 0.18a,b±0.02 | 0.13a±0.01 | 10.77b±0.25 | 4.53b±0.31 |
| L. shawii | 7.84±0.02 | 1460c±36.06 | 4.33c±0.15 | 2.5c±0.1 | 15.0c±0.2 | 0.3b±0.1 | 0.22b±0.03 | 15.27c±0.25 | 7.13c±0.15 |
| Subsurface (15-30 cm) | |||||||||
| P. undulata | 7.87±0.03 | 1066.67a±30.55 | 3.63a±0.15 | 2.0a±0.1 | 10.43a±0.21 | 0.2a±0.01 | 0.17a±0.02 | 11.23a±0.25 | 4.9a±0.1 |
| T. nilotica | 7.88±0.02 | 10900b±100 | 30.47b±0.5 | 17.93b±0.21 | 116.0b±0.3 | 4.97b±0.25 | 0.7b±0.2 | 120.13b±0.81 | 48.33b±0.61 |
| L. shawii | 7.85±0.01 | 6313.33c±25.17 | 20.2c±0.72 | 11.87c±0.15 | 63.33c±0.91 | 4.23c±0.25 | 0.42c±0.07 | 66.33c±0.42 | 32.03c±0.15 |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the probability level of 5% according to LSD. P: Pulicaria, T: Tamarix, L: Lycium
EC
The EC analysis showed the highest EC value at the soil surface for L. shawii (1,460 ppm), whereas P. undulata had the lowest EC value (231.67 ppm). On the soil’s subsurface 15-30 cm depth, T. nilotica showed the highest EC of 10,900 ppm, while P. undulata had the lowest 1,066.67 ppm [Table 3].
Soil cations (Ca 2+, Mg 2+, Na+, K+)
Cation analysis revealed that Na+ was the most abundant, followed by Ca2+, Mg 2+, and K+. Furthermore, Ca 2+ concentration in T. nilotica was the highest at the subsurface soil (30.47 mEq L-1), whereas P. undulata exhibited the lowest concentration (3.63 mEq L-1). Mg 2+ estimation showed the highest level in L. shawii at 0-15 cm depth (2.5 mEq L-1), while P. undulata had the lowest (0.2 mEq L-1). Similarly, P. undulata recorded the lowest at 15-30 cm depth (2.0 mEq L-1), whereas T. nilotica showed the highest concentration of Mg 2+ (17.93 mEq L-1). K + was the lowest cation among the others. T. nilotica soil demonstrated the highest level at subsurface, whereas P. undulata had the lowest at both surface and subsurface [Table 3].
Soil anions (CO3-2, HCO3-, Cl-, SO4-2)
Anions’ analysis showed Cl- had the highest level among the anions in all halophytes, followed by SO4-2 and CO3-2 + HCO3-, respectively. Furthermore, L. shawii had the highest Cl - level at the soil’s surface (15.27 mEq L-1), whilst T. nilotica had the highest at the subsurface (120.13 mEq L-1). On the other hand, P. undulata showed the lowest Cl- levels at both surface and subsurface (2.5 mEq L-1 and 11.23 mEq L-1, respectively) [Table 3].
Water sample analysis
The water sample showed a pH value of 7.16 and an EC of 112,233.3 ppm. Moreover, the soluble cations analysis showed that the soluble Na+ was the most abundant (1,345 mEq L-1), whereas the soluble K+ was the lowest (21.3 mEq L-1). Furthermore, Cl- had the highest estimation among the soluble anions (1,480.3 mEq L-1), whilst CO3--+HCO3- estimation was the lowest (23.3 mEq L-1) [Table 4].
| Sample | pH | EC (ppm) | Soluble cations (mEq L-1) | Soluble anions (mEq L-1) | SAR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca+2 | Mg+2 | Na+ | K+ | CO3--+HCO3- | Cl- | SO4-2 | ||||
| Water | 7.16 | 112233.3 | 251.0 | 112.5 | 1345.0 | 21.3 | 23.3 | 1480.3 | 228.0 | 99.8 |
SAR
The water sample is classified as fourth class, with the highest Na+ content [Table 4].
CaCO3
CaCO3 analysis showed the highest value in L. shawii soil surface (6.07%), whereas P. undulata had the lowest concentration (4.4%). At the soil subsurface, T. nilotica had the highest level (5.83%), while P. undulata had the lowest (4.47%) [Table 5].
| Chemical properties* | P. undulata | T. nilotica | L. shawii |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface (0-15 cm) | |||
| CaCO3 | 4.4a ± 0.62 | 4.97a ± 0.35 | 6.07b ± 0.4 |
| CEC | 9.8a ± 0.3 | 11.27b ± 0.25 | 9.03c ± 0.35 |
| O.M | 0.42a ± 0.08 | 0.83b ± 0.07 | 0.44a ± 0.06 |
| Gypsum | 0.36a ± 0.02 | 0.6b ± 0.04 | 0.53c ± 0.04 |
| ESP | 6.57a ± 0.31 | 7.63b ± 0.25 | 7.53b ± 0.4 |
| Subsurface (15-30 cm) | |||
| CaCO3 | 4.47a ± 0.15 | 5.83b ± 0.21 | 4.57a ± 0.35 |
| CEC | 10.73a ± 0.21 | 12.3b ± 0.3 | 10.17c ± 0.31 |
| O.M | 0.34a ± 0.06 | 0.74b ± 0.06 | 0.42a ± 0.07 |
| Gypsum | 0.57a ± 0.04 | 0.78b ± 0.02 | 0.66c ± 0.03 |
| ESP | 7.7a ± 0.26 | 9.4b ± 0.4 | 11.4c ± 0.5 |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the probability level of 5% according to LSD.
Caco3: calcium carbonate, CEC: cation exchange capacity, OM: organic matter, ESP: exchangeable sodium percentage
CEC
CEC estimation revealed the highest value in T. nilotica soil subsurface (12.3 Meq/100g) and 11.27 Meq/100g at the soil surface, whereas L. shawii had the lowest at both depths [Table 5].
OM
OM content was relatively high in the soil of T. nilotica, reaching 0.83% and 0.74% at the soil surface and subsurface, respectively. Whereas the soils of the P. undulata and L. shawii showed similar OM values [Table 5].
GC
The GC analysis indicated close values, with a low range of 0.36-0.78% in the selected soils. T. nilotica was slightly higher than the others [Table 5].
ESP
ESP analysis showed a wide range of 6.57-7.63% at the soil surface and 7.7-11.4% at the soil subsurface in selected halophytes. The highest values were observed in L. shawii soil at the soil’s subsurface (15-30 cm), while the lowest values were recorded for p. undulata soil at the soil’s surface (0-15 cm) [Table 5].
Physiological analysis
Growth characters
L. shawii showed the largest leaf area compared to the other plants, with an average of 2.34 cm 2/plant. In contrast, the T. nilotica has the smallest leaf area, with an average of 0.66 cm2/plant [Table 6, Figure 5].
| Sample* | Leaf area | Chl A | Chl B | Car | T. Chl | Chl A/B | T. Chl/Car |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. | 1.22a± 0.03 | 3.71a± 0.15 | 1.75a± 0.94 | 2.19a± 0.13 | 5.46a± 1.09 | 2.45± 0.95 | 7.64a± 1.05 |
| T. | 0.66b± 0.08 | 1.04b± 0.18 | 0.36b± 0.1 | 0.83b± 0.17 | 1.41b± 0.27 | 2.94± 0.55 | 2.24b± 0.42 |
| L. | 2.34c± 0.05 | 0.77b± 0.34 | 0.28b± 0.11 | 0.44c± 0.18 | 1.05b± 0.44 | 2.77± 0.43 | 1.48b± 0.63 |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the probability level of 5% according to LSD.
P: Pulicaria undulata, T: Tamarix nilotica, L: Lycium shawii, Chl: chlorophyll, Car: carotene, T: Total

- Estimation of leaf area of the selected halophytes. L. shawii had the largest leaf area of 2.34 cm2/plant, whereas T. nilotica had the smallest (0.66 cm2/plant).
Photosynthetic pigment
Photosynthesis pigment estimation showed that P. undulata had the highest Chl A and B concentrations, as well as carotene, total Chl, and the Chl/carotene ratio, compared to the others. In comparison, L. shawii showed the lowest in all [Table 6, Figure 6].

- Estimation of Chl pigments (A and B), total Chl, and carotene in the selected halophytes. P. undulata had the highest concentration of Chl A, Chl B, carotene, and total Chl/carotene, while L. shawii had the lowest. On the other hand, T. nilotica had the highest Chl A/B, whereas P. undulata had the lowest.
Antioxidants
Peroxidase enzyme estimation showed the highest in L. shawii (477.33 u/g fresh weight/h) and the lowest in P. undulata (325 u/g fresh weight/h). Additionally, P. undulata showed the highest in polyphenol oxidase analysis (38.94 u/g fresh weight/h), whereas T. nilotica had the lowest (30.72 u/g fresh weight/h) [Table 7, Figure 7].
| Sample | Tot. carbs | TSS | Proline | Protein | Peroxidase | Phenoloxidase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. | 28.42a± 0.11 | 341.17a± 23.82 | 33.8a± 3.22 | 13.06a± 0.28 | 325.0a± 10.15 | 38.94a± 0.76 |
| T. | 31.50b± 0.12 | 640.48b± 15.03 | 25.49b± 1.11 | 18.95b± 0.36 | 419.0b± 2.65 | 30.72b± 0.94 |
| L. | 16.80c± 0.13 | 278.55c± 20.68 | 46.66c± 3.0 | 15.41c± 0.09 | 477.33c± 9.5 | 36.48c± 0.67 |
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the probability level of 5% according to LSD.
P: Pulicaria undulata, T: Tamarix nilotica, L: Lycium shawii, Tot. carbs: total carbohydrates, TSS: total soluble sugars.

- Estimation of antioxidant levels in the selected halophytes. L. shawii showed the highest concentration of peroxidase, and P. undulata had the lowest. However, polyphenol oxidase activity was similar among the selected halophytes, ranging from 30-38 µg fresh wt/h.
Proline
Proline estimation demonstrated the highest level in L. shawii (46.66 mg/100g dry weight) and the lowest in T. nilotica (25.49 mg/100g dry weight) [Table 7].
Total carbohydrates and soluble sugars
Carbohydrate estimation showed the highest content in T. nilotica (31.5%), while the L. shawii had the lowest (16.8%). Furthermore, soluble sugar analysis showed the highest value in T. nilotica (640.48 mg/100g dry wt), whereas L. shawii showed the lowest (278.55 mg/100g dry wt) [Table 7, Figure 8].

- Estimation of total carbohydrates and protein in the selected halophytes. T. nilotica showed the highest estimation in both, whereas P. undulata had the lowest protein content, and L. shawii had the lowest in total carbohydrates.
Free amino acids (Protein)
Protein analysis showed the lowest protein content in P. undulata (13.06%), while T. nilotica demonstrated the highest (18.95%) [Table 7, Figure 8].
Salinity significantly alters soil characteristics. Hence, elevated soil salt levels can lead to increased bulk density, soil compaction, compromised soil structure, clay dispersion, and the formation of surface crusts.[35] Table 1 shows that sand content is high across all soils due to the desert environment, where sandy soils are more prevalent. Moreover, the prevalence of sand contributes to soil porosity and total pore volume, allowing well-structured soil to not impose restrictions on the growth of the tested plant roots, which aligns with the soil texture investigation by Ibraheem et al. (2021) in selected halophytes.[36]
Db analysis showed the lowest in T. nilotica, which may be attributed to the soil texture under T. nilotica, which is fine sandy, and to higher total porosity. In addition, T. nilotica harbors a higher clay content, which also contributes to lower Db values. In contrast, the soil under L. shawii is moderately coarse sandy, thus exhibiting the highest Db and Dp values at both depths [Table 2]. Furthermore, P% analysis showed the highest value in T. nilotica soil at both depths, likely due to its soil texture and high OM and clay content. In contrast, L. shawii soil had the lowest P% at both depths, likely due to its low levels of both OM and clay content [Table 2]. According to Abd El-Wahab and Al-Salameen (2015), soil’s porosity increases with a higher OM%, while it decreases with increasing soil depth; hence, at the subsurface level, due to the increased pressure from the upper layers, leading to particle compaction and reduced interstitial spaces.[37] Our OM determination showed the highest value in T. nilotica soil at both depths [Table 5], which is attributed to its clay and silt content. It is worth mentioning that the soil’s OM content decreased as the depth increased, reflecting the presence of biological processes in the surface layer, hence making it higher in OM. Overall, the selected halophytes showed low levels of OM (below the reference range of 0.86%),[38] which may be due to rapid decomposition of OM in the soil caused by high temperatures, reduced rainfall, and increased soil aeration.[39] Similar findings by Ibraheem et al. (2021) were reported, in which the soil in most areas exhibited extremely low levels of organic matter, falling below the detectable limit in the selected halophytes.[36]
HC investigation revealed high values ranging from 23.33-26.33 cm h-1 at the soil surface and 23.67-27 cm h-1 at the subsurface [Table 2]. These values are generally elevated, indicating very rapid water movement, which is likely due to the overall sandy texture of the studied soils, which commonly have macropores between particles with little resistance to water movement, as well as fast drainage and low water retention. Moreover, T. nilotica had the lowest HC at 15-30 cm, which may be due to its fine, sandy soil and its high silt/clay ratio. Similar findings were reported by Bocuti et al. (2020), who found that decreased HC is affected by the high silt-clay ratio and fine particles.[40]
pH was the same for all selected halophytes and was slightly alkaline (7.8), which is attributed to the high soluble salts in saline soils [Table 3]. Similar results were reported by Ibraheem et al. (2022), who reported that the pH of the halophyte soil ranged from 7-8.[41]
Cation analysis showed Na+ with the highest concentration, followed by K+. On the other hand, anion analysis showed that Cl- had the highest concentration, and CO2+HCO3 had the lowest [Table 3]. Similar findings were reported by Basyoni and Aref (2016), where Na+ was the highest among cations and Cl- among anions in Sabkhat Jizan.[42] Furthermore, plant exposure to salinity is reported to lead to a significant rise in Na+ and Cl- levels in the soil, resulting in the induction of osmotic stress.[43] Moreover, EC analysis indicated variations from one depth to another for the same plant. These variations can be attributed to rainfall, which leaches excess salt from the soil and precipitates it in lower layers. Additionally, there are overall differences in EC among the soils of the studied plants. For instance, T. nilotica exhibited the highest at the soil’s subsurface, likely due to its proximity to saline water accumulation (the lake), resulting in higher soil salinity as well as its fine sandy-textured soil. Furthermore, it may also be attributed to its high silt and clay content, which reflects a higher retention of salts in the soil. On the other hand, P. undulata showed the lowest EC at both depths, as it is farther from the saline water accumulation [Table 3]. Additionally, the soils of P. undulata and L. shawii are moderately coarse sandy, which results in easier leaching of salt by rainfall compared to fine sand.[44] Overall, all soil analyses of CaCO3 were within the normal range (<8%) due to the soil’s slight alkalinity (pH 7.8).[45] The water sample is classified as fourth class, with the highest Na+ content (SAR mean of 99.8) [Table 4]. Hence, it is unsuitable for irrigation for all crops.[46]
CEC estimation showed the highest level in T. nilotica, which may be attributed to its high clay and OM content. Hence, the smaller the soil particles, the larger the specific surface area, and consequently, the CEC increases.[47] According to Audah and Shamsham (2008), soils with high clay and OM content generally exhibit higher CEC than sandy or low-OM soils. Furthermore, CEC is influenced by various factors, including soil texture, the quantity and type of clay minerals, OM, pH, and the soil’s chemical composition. Therefore, CEC is considered an estimate of soil fertility, since exchangeable cations serve as the primary source of essential nutrients for plant growth. In addition, the GC in the selected soils ranged from 0.36-0.78%, within the expected range for sandy soils [Table 5]. Gypsum is widely distributed in arid and semi-arid regions. Gypsum crystals partially dissolve in water, with an estimated solubility of 2.6 g L-1. Thus, determining the soil content of gypsum helps identify and characterize soil properties.[45]
ESP analysis showed the highest values in T. nilotica and L. shawii, due to their higher Na+ concentrations than other cations [Table 5], as indicated by the soil chemical analysis. It’s worth mentioning that there are noticeable differences in ESP between the depths of the soil for L. shawii. This difference is attributed to leaching of the soil surface after rainfall, leading to salt deposition in lower soil layers. Moreover, leaching of high-salt content is a good indicator that allows seeds to germinate, roots to grow, and facilitates nutrient availability for the plant.[48]
L. shawii showed the largest leaf area compared to the other plants, with an average of 2.34 cm2/plant [Table 6, Figure 5]. Despite being subjected to considerable abiotic stress, the soil salinity beneath is estimated at EC 9.8 mΩ (6313.33 ppm) [Table 3]. In contrast, T. nilotica has the smallest leaf area, averaging 0.66 cm2/plant, which can be attributed to its severe salinity stress, as the salinity level in its subsurface soil is extremely high (17 mΩ = 10900 ppm), causing the plant to reduce transpiration and water loss by minimizing leaf area [Table 6, Figure 5]. Furthermore, salt stress limits cell elongation in the growing tissue, leading to decreased leaf area and reduced dry matter assimilation in the plant. Moreover, prolonged exposure to salinity reduces photosynthesis rates, diminishes nutrient storage, and decreases growth hormone production.[43] Additionally, salt glands, such as those found in young leaves of T. nilotica, are also present in most halophytes,[10] serving for ion isolation due to the presence of small vacuoles in these leaves.[49]
Photosynthesis pigment estimation showed that P. undulata had the highest Chl A and Chl B concentration, as well as total Chl, carotene, and the Chl/carotene ratio, whereas L. shawii showed the lowest in all. Maybe due to its less exposure to stress [Table 6, Figure 6]. Additionally, the high carotenoid content in P. undulata may have aided the protection of photosynthetic pigments by quenching singlet oxygen (1O2) and peroxyl radicals generated by excess excitation of Chl under intense light and high temperatures.[50,51] Carotenoids serve a crucial function as non-enzymatic antioxidants, protecting the photosynthetic system. Ghanem et al. (2021) demonstrated notable increases in carotenoid levels with elevated NaCl concentrations in selected halophytes. This upsurge in carotenoid concentration could be a strategic response to preserve Chl levels, preventing their decrease under varying salinity concentrations. Generally, saline and arid conditions significantly reduce pigment synthesis, thereby lowering the net photosynthetic rate. It is worth mentioning that P. undulata exhibited the lowest Chl A/B (2.45). At the same time, T. nilotica recorded the highest value of (2.94) [Table 6, Figure 6], which is attributed to the fact that under saline stress conditions, the plant tends to develop an increase in this ratio, which, in turn, leads to a reduction in the photosynthetic process.[18] which further confirms that P. undulata experiences less stress than other plants. Furthermore, Pérez-Labrada et al. (2019) reported that under saline stress, the plant exhibits an elevated Chl A/B ratio compared to non-stress conditions, leading to an imbalance that hinders photosynthesis.[52] In addition, photosynthesis is among the most vulnerable physiological processes to ROS induced by salinity. This susceptibility is attributed to the fact that the photosynthetic photosystem reaction centers (PSI and PSII) are the primary sites for ROS generation within chloroplasts.[53,50] Therefore, the presence of salt stress has the potential to diminish the Chl content in leaves, consequently impacting the efficiency of photosynthesis. Zhang et al. (2022) have reported similar observations: a decline in Chl A, B, and overall Chl content resulting from increased salt concentration.[54]
Notably, T. nilotica showed low Chl content, although it had the highest carbohydrate estimation. Maybe because carbohydrates can be generated independently of Chl via several metabolic processes, such as fat oxidation. L. shawii had the lowest Chl parameters, except for the Chl A/B ratio (which is a stress indicator), which may be attributed to its high soil salinity, which inhibits leaf photosynthetic rate and increases CO2 concentration inside cells, thus reducing carbohydrate synthesis [Figure 8]. Additionally, TSS estimation showed the highest in T. nilotica and the lowest in L. shawii. Soluble sugars are vital in the osmotic stress response, helping plants cope with high salinity, increase water uptake, and provide nutrients for growth.[1] Similar findings were reported by Guo et al. (2020), who found that soluble sugar levels increased in leaves and stems after treatment with 200 mM NaCl.[55] In addition, high levels of NaCl were found to inhibit starch accumulation, thereby impacting photosynthesis. Moreover, stress-induced responses in halophytes generally involve: 1) the buildup of essential compounds (such as soluble sugars and amino acids) to resist osmotic stress and maintain cellular osmotic potential and metabolism; 2) secondary metabolites, serving as potential antioxidants and regulatory substances.[56]
Proline estimation showed the lowest in T. nilotica and the highest in L. shawii [Table 7]. Proline is reported to serve as a nitrogen source for plants during recovery phases and as a promoter of antioxidant enzyme activities. Hence, the high estimated proline level in L. shawii may be attributed to the high peroxidase enzyme activity. Additionally, proline levels are mediated by Ca; therefore, they may contribute to the Ca levels at the soil surface reported in the previous chemical analysis section, as well as to peroxidase.[57,58] Furthermore, plants accumulate osmotic modulators, such as proline, to maintain osmotic pressure under salt stress.[59,60] Moreover, Ghanem et al. (2021) have reported an increase in proline synthesis in halophytes at high salinity levels, which may be considered as a coping mechanism to compensate for the reduction in carotene and flavonoids, hence aiding the free radical scavenging activity.[18] Furthermore, protein analysis showed the highest content in T. nilotica, whereas P. undulata had the lowest [Table 7, Figure 8]. There is an inverse correlation between protein and proline content since proline is generated from protein breakdown. Therefore, we observed that T. nilotica had the highest protein content and the lowest proline content.[61]
Lastly, excessive ROS generation in halophytes results from salinity stress, leading to imbalances in redox reactions.[43] In addition, ROS production induces carbohydrate oxidation and pigment breakdown.[36] Therefore, we found increased levels of the antioxidant enzymes peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase to cope with elevated ROS levels [Table 7, Figure 7]. Similar results were reported by Ghanem et al. (2021), who found that peroxidase levels were high in halophytes, helping decrease free radical concentrations.[18]
CONCLUSION
Understanding the physiological adaptation of halophytes within the constraints imposed by these unique environmental systems is crucial for ecosystem sustainability. The selected halophytes are exposed to different salinity levels; therefore, they exhibited adaptive mechanisms such as 1) synthesis of organic osmolytes for osmotic adjustment, 2) activation of antioxidant enzymes to scavenge free radicals, which were reported in all selected halophytes, and 3) downregulation of overall metabolism to avoid oxidative stress reported in L. shawii, 4) reducing leaf area to minimize transpiration that was seen in T. nilotica, 5) Upsurge carotenoid biosynthesis for preserve Chl levels that was observed in P. undulata.
These results shed light on the importance of these plants as promising models for halophytes and as economically and biologically valuable, for instance, for conservation and rehabilitation of saline areas.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
References
- Salt stress inhibits photosynthesis and destroys chloroplast structure by downregulating chloroplast development–related genes in robinia pseudoacacia seedlings. Plants. 2023;12:1283.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Saudi ministry of environment of water and agriculture. KSA national environment strategy Executive summary. In: Gender, the environment and sustainable development in Asia and the pacific Gender, the environment and sustainable development in Asia and the pacific: United Nations 2017;7-11.
- Vegetation and condition of arid rangeland ecosystem in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25:1022-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Floristic diversity and vegetation of the az Zakhnuniyah Island, Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. Heliyon. 2022;8:e09996.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Describing the physiological responses of different rice genotypes to salt stress using sigmoid and piecewise linear functions. Field Crops Res. 2018;220:46-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Vegetation composition of the halophytic grass aeluropus lagopoides communities within coastal and inland sabkhas of saudi arabia. Plants (Basel). 2022;11:666.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Comparative phytochemical profile and biological activity of four major medicinal halophytes from Qassim flora. Plants (Basel). 2021;10:2208.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Anti-Microbial, Antioxidant, and α-Amylase inhibitory activity of traditionally-used medicinal herbs: A comparative analyses of pharmacology, and phytoconstituents of regional halophytic plants’ diaspora. Molecules. 2020;25:5457.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Hydrogeochemical processes and isotopic characteristics of Inland Sabkha, Saudi Arabia. Asian J of Earth Sciences. 2007;1:16-30.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kiani-Pouya A. Understanding the role of stomatal traits and tissue-tolerance mechanisms in salinity stress responses in quinoa and wild barley. Tasmania; 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25959/100.00035074 [Last accessed on 2026 Jan 10]
- Reproductive physiology of halophytes: Current standing. Front Plant Sci. 2019;9:1954.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Role of secondary metabolites in salt and heavy metal stress mitigation by halophytic plants: An overview. In: Handbook of bioremediation Handbook of bioremediation. Elsevier; 2021. p. :307-2.
- [Google Scholar]
- Use of halophytes as medicinal plants: Phytochemical diversity and biological activity. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Shabala S, Fujita M, eds. Halophytes and climate change: adaptive mechanisms and potential uses. Illustrate. Gloucester: CABI; 2019. p. :343-58.
- [Google Scholar]
- Metabolomic insights into the mechanisms underlying tolerance to salinity in different halophytes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;135:528-45.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Natural vegetation cover analysis in Wadi Hagul, Egypt using hyperspectral remote sensing approach. Egypt J Remote Space Sci. 2019;22:253-62.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of recurrent salt and drought stress treatments on the endangered halophyte limonium angustebracteatum Erben. Plants (Basel). 2023;12:191.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Dual function of Arabidopsis ATAF1 in abiotic and biotic stress responses. Cell Res. 2009;19:1279-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Differential salt tolerance strategies in three halophytes from the same ecological habitat: Augmentation of antioxidant enzymes and compounds. Plants (Basel). 2021;10:1100.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Chemical profile, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities of the water-ethanol extract of pulicaria undulata growing in the oasis of central Saudi Arabian desert. Plants (Basel). 2021;10:1811.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Manual of Riyadh plants. Riyadh: High commsion for the development of Riyadh; 2014. Available from: https://www.rcrc.gov.sa/en/publication/manual-of-riyadh-plants [Last accessed on 2026 Jan 10]
- Field guide to the wild plants of Oman. Muscat: Ministry of agriculture and fisheries wealth, sultanate of Oman; 2015.
- Soil survey staff. soil survey laboratory methods manual. Burt R, editor. Soil survey investigations report. Nebraska: United States Department of Agriculture 2014
- Burt R, ed. Soil Survey Manual. Washington, D.C.: USDA; 2017. Available from: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. [Last accessed 2019 Dec 12]
- Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd ed). Wisconsin: American society of agronomy, soil science society of America; 1982. Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19841981415. [Last accessed 2024 Jan 28]
- Soil survey staff. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Burt R, editor. Soil survey investigations report. Nebraska: USDA; 2004. Available from: http://soils.usda.gov/technical/lmm/%0Ahttp://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ol049448l%0Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15176797%0Ahttp://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1669%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201 [Last accessed on 2026 Jan 10].
- FAO. Walkley-black method, titration and colorimetric method. Standard operating procedure for soil organic carbon; 2019. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/ca7471en/ca7471en.pdf. [Last accessed 2024 Feb 28].
- Diagnosis and improvement of saline and Alkali soils. Soil Sci. 1954;78 Available from: https://journals.lww.com/soilsci/fulltext/1954/08000/diagnosis_and_improvement_of_saline_and_alkali.12.aspx [Last accessed on 2026 Jan 10]
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cock JH, Internacional C, Tropical DA, Alejandra M, Herrera T. Non-destructive monitoring system in cassava. 2023.
- Experiments in plant physiology. New York: van nostrand Reinhold; 1971. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:82980475 [Last accessed on 2026 Jan 10]
- Peroxidase activity and phytophthora resistance in different organs of potato plant. Phytopathology. 1967;69:l.
- [Google Scholar]
- Physiological and biochemical studies on drought tolerance of wheat plants by application of amino acids and yeast extract. Ann Agricultural Sci. 2014;59:133-45.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-7.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28:350-6.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Modified ninhydrin colorimetric analysis for amino acids. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1957;67:10-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adaptive mechanisms of halophytes and their potential in improving salinity tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10733.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Ecological risk assessment of potential toxic elements in salt marshes on the east coast of the red sea: Differential physiological responses and adaptation capacities of dominant halophytes. Sustainability. 2021;13:11282.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Biology of desert environment (1st ed). Kuwait: that Al Salasil bookstore; 2015. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282122111_Biology_of_Desert_Environment
- Alzoubi M, Alhossny A, Drgham H. Analysis methods for soil, plant, water, and fertilizers. Alshater M, editor. Damscus: Gen Commission Sci Agricultural Res 2013
- Soil aeration in relation to soil physical properties, nitrogen availability, and root characteristics within an arctic watershed. Plant Soil. 1996;178:37-48.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Effective hydraulic conductivity and its relationship with the other attributes of Cerrado soils. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient. 2020;24:357-63.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Physiological adaptation of three wild halophytic suaeda species: Salt Tolerance strategies and metal accumulation capacity. Plants (Basel). 2022;11:537.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Composition and origin of the sabkha brines, and their environmental impact on infrastructure in Jizan area, Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci. 2016;75:105.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under salinity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:9326.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Salt accumulation in the root zone of the halophyte atriplex nummularia. Western Australia; 2014. Available from: https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/salt-accumulation-in-the-root-zone-of-the-halophyte-atriplex-numm [Last accessed on 2026 Jan 10]
- Soil fertility and plant nutrition. University of homs. Homs: Univ Homs; 2008.
- A Summary of water suitability criteria for irrigation. J Soil Sci Agricultural Eng. 2016;7:981-9.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A manual on the interpretation and significance of soil and water analysis measurements. Giza: Soil, Water Environment Res Institute; 2019.
- Impacts of soil salinity/sodicity on soil-water relations and plant growth in dry land areas: A review. J Nat Sci Res 2021
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Halophytes as new model plant species for salt tolerance strategies. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1137211.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Production of reactive oxygen species by photosystem ii as a response to light and temperature stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1950.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Singlet oxygen oxidation products of carotenoids, fatty acids and phenolic prenyllipids. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2021;216:112148.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Responses of tomato plants under saline stress to foliar application of copper nanoparticles. Plants (Basel). 2019;8:151.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:391-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Structure, development, and the salt response of salt bladders in Chenopodium album L. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:989946.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- NaCl improves reproduction by enhancing starch accumulation in the ovules of the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:262.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Analysis of widely targeted metabolites of the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa under saline conditions provides new insights into salt tolerance and nutritional value in halophytic species. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:388.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Responses to salinity in four plantago species from Tunisia. Plants (Basel). 2021;10:1392.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- Insights into the physiological and biochemical impacts of salt stress on plant growth and development. Agronomy. 2020;10:938.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:89-97.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Changes in the alternative electron sinks and antioxidant defence in chloroplasts of the extreme halophyte Eutrema parvulum (Thellungiella parvula) under salinity. Ann Bot. 2015;115:449-63.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
- A Study on the accumulation of proline - an osmoprotectant amino acid under salt stress in some native rice cultivars of North Kerala, India. Ujar. 2015;3:15-22.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
